Turn Up the Heat: Elevated Temperature Comparison of Materials
Introduction
In the last article, Soaking Up the Sun: A Materials Comparison of Weather Resistance, we showed a comparison of how the eight selected materials faired when subjected to a summer in Arizona. Here, we will discuss the changes to the mechanical properties when materials are subjected to elevated temperatures for 21 days.
Materials
To get a better feel for how different materials behave in a hot environment, our material selection includes a wide range of materials. Below in Table 1, is a listing of the materials selected for evaluation.
|
Material Name
|
Material Description |
Polymer Films |
63-20
|
Polyvinyl chloride film (20 mil) |
FEP-5 |
Fluorinated ethylene propylene film (5 mil)
|
|
PFR-10 |
Polyether-based polyurethane film (10 mil)
|
|
FSR-16
|
Fluorinated rubber film (16 mil) |
|
Coated Fabrics |
VNHLT-23 |
Polyvinyl chloride coated nylon fabric (23 mil)
|
PVL-10 |
Polyvinyl chloride coated polyester fabric (10 mil)
|
|
RPH-14 |
Polyurethane coated polyester fabric (14 mil)
|
|
Fabric
|
Trevira |
Canvas fabric (15 mil)
|
Table 1. Listing of materials selected for evaluation
How Can We Compare These Materials?
Tensile strength will be tested, just like before, to understand how elevated temperatures affect the mechanical properties of these materials. Mechanisms here can occur at different scales. At elevated temperatures, however, the mechanisms are similar to those mentioned in the weathering test. See Figure 1 for some examples of mechanism for degradation at elevated temperatures.
Experimental Test Set-Up
Four groups of samples were tested, all differing by the temperature the samples were subjected to for 21 days. See Figure 2 for the breakdown of groupings. Tensile strength was determined by a modified version of ASTM D638.
Results
It should be noted that typically fabric, elastomeric and non-elastomeric samples follow different protocols when measuring tensile strength. The values here should only be regarded as qualitative values for comparison, rather than actual values of measured tensile strength.
In this test, FEP-5 showed the most stable behavior. FSR-16 showed stable behavior after an initial increase from baseline at 50°C. Both 63-20 and PFR were not able to be tested at 150°C. PFR melted to the pan used in the oven and 63-20 was so brittle, that when placed into the grips for tensile testing, the samples crumbled. VHNLT-23 showed the largest decrease in tensile strength at 150°C. This isn’t surprising since this material is better suited for low temperature environments. Trevira and PVL-10 had similar tensile behavior, where the tensile strength significantly dropped off at 150°C. RPH-14 showed an initial increase, then held somewhat steady before decreasing at 150°C.
|
Tensile Strength (MPa)
|
Ranking |
||||
50 |
100 |
150 |
50 |
100 |
150 |
|
|
+96.67 |
+92.14 |
N/A |
4 |
4 |
-- |
|
+0.11 |
+2.15 |
+4.13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
+124.94 |
+109.78 |
N/A |
6 |
5 |
-- |
|
+41.97 |
+43.31 |
+48.88 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
+280.67 |
+146.14 |
-410.82 |
7 |
6 |
6 |
|
+122.56 |
+185.19 |
-99.48 |
5 |
7 |
3 |
|
+311.62 |
+286.16 |
-184.92 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
|
+43.22 |
+78.12 |
-145.78 |
3 |
3 |
4 |
Final Thoughts
Based on the data collected from this comparative study, we can conclude how these materials behave at elevated temperatures for a short duration. From this testing, most of these materials are not well suited for temperatures greatly exceeding 100°C. Of the eight materials, FEP-5 and FSR-16 would be better options. Zippertubing® does have a portfolio of materials that are better suited for elevated temperatures that were not included in this study, such as our ALHTG-65.
Contact us to learn more.